Permission in Principle
In 2016, The Housing and Planning Bill 2016 introduced the move to permitting development via a ‘Permission in Principle’ (PiP) relating to sites on a register of brownfield land held by each local authority, or otherwise identified in a local or neighbourhood plan. Thus, local planning authorities can grant planning permission to brownfield sites in order to speed up housing development. This would mean that development is automatically agreed ‘in principle’, separately from the technical details of the application itself.
Stemming from debates at Big Meet 4, supporters of Place Alliance have had considerable concerns over what the proposed new provisions would mean for the important role of the planning system in place-making. Place Alliance has therefore sought to pragmatically investigate how the new provisions might be used positively to achieve both the Government’s aim of greater certainty in the planning process, whilst still enabling the proper consideration of design and other qualitative concerns through the planning system.
About the campaign
The Bill was voted through after its third reading in the House of Commons this week. It is more than likely that its provisions, including PiP will move forward and be with us in practice soon. But, the secondary details, for example what should be considered at the technical consents stage, whether such consents applications will be viewed as planning applications and so on have not been set yet. So there is still, hopefully, time to influence how PiP will work, and in particular how place and design quality can be guided, assessed and assured through the system.
PiP: Design, Quality and Technical Consents Workshop
After the Housing & Planning Bill was voted through after its third reading in the House of Commons, Place Alliance, together with Urban Design London organised an open forum and workshop to discuss how design quality might be secured under the provisions of the Bill.
The workshop aimed to develop practical, workable ways to do this that can then
be offered to DCLG as suggestions in the hope to influence how PiP will work, and in particular how place and design quality can be guided, assessed and assured through the system.
Possible Solution: Co-ordinating Code
Place Alliance have been working with Studio REAL to produce a template Co-ordinating Code that could be used by local authorities on key brownfield sites when ‘Planning in Principle’ (PiP) takes effect on registered brownfield sites or sites otherwise identified in a development plan under the new Housing and Planning Act. The Code is just two sides of A3 and illustrates key requirements under four headings:
- Landscape setting
- Community and Land-use
In June the work was presented to DCLG.
Responding in Parliament to proposed amendments to the Permission in Principle clauses of the Housing and Planning Bill, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced that such codes could be used alongside and referred to in Permission in Principle. Given the significance of such designation and the minimal amount of time and resources required to prepare coordinating codes, we argue that their preparation should be mandatory for all sites given Permission in Principle.
Matthew Carmona in his blog on the Coordinating Codes as the possible solution to the Permission in Principle and the way to achieve both the Government’s aim of greater certainty in the planning process, whilst still enabling the proper consideration of design and...
Matthew Carmona outlines a way of improving this broad-brush approach to planning approvals. He argues, that it may be possible to combine the designation of PiP with the production of a simple Coordinating Code for each allocated site. Read the full article in Urban...
Matthew Carmona in his blog discusses the matter of Permission in Principle, that has been introduced in the Housing and Planning Bill 2016. Read the full article here →